linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION] fuse: execve() fails with ETXTBSY due to async fuse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 14:38:44 +0200
From:   Jürg Billeter <j@...ron.ch>
To:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] fuse: execve() fails with ETXTBSY due to async
 fuse_flush

On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 14:28 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 14:07, Bernd Schubert 
> > fuse: Avoid flush for O_RDONLY
> > 
> > From: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>
> > 
> > A file opened in read-only moded does not have data to be
> > flushed, so no need to send flush at all.
> > 
> > This also mitigates -EBUSY for executables, which is due to
> > async flush with commit 5a8bee63b1.
> 
> Does it?  If I read the bug report correctly, it's the write case that
> causes EBUSY.

Indeed, I see this when trying to execute a file after a process wrote
to (created) that file. As far as I can tell, `ETXTBSY` can't happen on
exec without the file being opened for writing and thus, I don't see
this patch mitigating this bug.

Jürg