| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230814134147.70289-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 21:41:46 +0800
From: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, mykolal@...com,
shuah@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
hffilwlqm@...il.com, tangyeechou@...il.com,
kernel-patches-bot@...com, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop bug
>From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before.
>From commit e411901c0b775a3a ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms
for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64.
>From commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f8 ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program
to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs.
How about combining them all together?
1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram.
2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram.
3. The tailcall calls itself.
As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop halts the
machine.
As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack
and RAX register between BPF subprograms. So do it in FENTRY/FEXIT
trampolines.
Fixes: ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT")
Fixes: e411901c0b77 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
include/linux/bpf.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 5 +++--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 +++++++--
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index a5930042139d3..ca5366d97ad04 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1018,6 +1018,10 @@ static void emit_shiftx(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg, u8 src_reg, bool is64, u8 op)
#define INSN_SZ_DIFF (((addrs[i] - addrs[i - 1]) - (prog - temp)))
+/* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */
+#define RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack) \
+ EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x85, -round_up(stack, 8) - 8)
+
static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image,
int oldproglen, struct jit_context *ctx, bool jmp_padding)
{
@@ -1623,9 +1627,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
if (tail_call_reachable) {
- /* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */
- EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x85,
- -round_up(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth, 8) - 8);
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth);
if (!imm32)
return -EINVAL;
offs = 7 + x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(&prog, func);
@@ -2464,6 +2466,8 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
else
/* sub rsp, stack_size */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xEC, stack_size);
+ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
+ EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */
/* mov QWORD PTR [rbp - rbx_off], rbx */
emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_6, -rbx_off);
@@ -2516,6 +2520,12 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
restore_regs(m, &prog, regs_off);
save_args(m, &prog, arg_stack_off, true);
+ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
+ /* Before calling the original function, restore the
+ * tail_call_cnt from stack.
+ */
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack_size);
+
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK) {
emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, 8);
EMIT2(0xff, 0xd0); /* call *rax */
@@ -2569,7 +2579,12 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
ret = -EINVAL;
goto cleanup;
}
- }
+ } else if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
+ /* Before running the original function, restore the
+ * tail_call_cnt from stack.
+ */
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack_size);
+
/* restore return value of orig_call or fentry prog back into RAX */
if (save_ret)
emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, -8);
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index cfabbcf47bdb8..55c72086034ef 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1028,6 +1028,11 @@ struct btf_func_model {
*/
#define BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY BIT(6)
+/* Indicate that current trampoline is in a tail call context. Then, it has to
+ * cache and restore tail_call_cnt to avoid infinite tail call loop.
+ */
+#define BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX BIT(7)
+
/* Each call __bpf_prog_enter + call bpf_func + call __bpf_prog_exit is ~50
* bytes on x86.
*/
@@ -1147,6 +1152,7 @@ struct bpf_attach_target_info {
struct module *tgt_mod;
const char *tgt_name;
const struct btf_type *tgt_type;
+ bool tail_call_ctx;
};
#define BPF_DISPATCHER_MAX 48 /* Fits in 2048B */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 78acf28d48732..0fae334e3f7b8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -415,8 +415,8 @@ static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, bool lock_direct_mut
goto out;
}
- /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY */
- tr->flags &= BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY;
+ /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY and TAIL_CALL_CTX */
+ tr->flags &= (BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY | BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX);
if (tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT].nr_links ||
tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN].nr_links) {
@@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_get(u64 key,
memcpy(&tr->func.model, &tgt_info->fmodel, sizeof(tgt_info->fmodel));
tr->func.addr = (void *)tgt_info->tgt_addr;
+ tr->flags = (tgt_info->tail_call_ctx ? BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX : 0);
out:
mutex_unlock(&tr->mutex);
return tr;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4ccca1f6c9981..a78e5a2ae5c72 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -19400,10 +19400,15 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
return -EINVAL;
fallthrough;
case BPF_MODIFY_RETURN:
- case BPF_LSM_MAC:
- case BPF_LSM_CGROUP:
case BPF_TRACE_FENTRY:
case BPF_TRACE_FEXIT:
+ if (tgt_prog && subprog > 0 &&
+ tgt_prog->aux->func[subprog]->is_func &&
+ tgt_prog->aux->tail_call_reachable)
+ tgt_info->tail_call_ctx = true;
+ fallthrough;
+ case BPF_LSM_MAC:
+ case BPF_LSM_CGROUP:
if (!btf_type_is_func(t)) {
bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u is not a function\n",
btf_id);
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists