linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] PCI: microchip: Rename IRQ init function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230814-vividness-disgrace-115283ea6f9a@wendy>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 14:55:40 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
CC:     Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Mason Huo <mason.huo@...rfivetech.com>,
        Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
        Kevin Xie <kevin.xie@...rfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] PCI: microchip: Rename IRQ init function

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 04:20:12PM +0800, Minda Chen wrote:
> Rename IRQ init function and prepare for re-use
> IRQ init function.
> 
> rename list:
> mc_init_interrupts -> plda_init_interrupts
> mc_pcie_init_irq_domain-> plda_pcie_init_irq_domains
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
> ---
>  .../pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c | 37 +++++++++++++------
>  drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h       |  7 ++++
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> index b42f1aac3ec3..140e7ca1a5cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static int mc_pcie_init_clks(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int mc_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct plda_pcie_rp *port)
> +static int plda_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct plda_pcie_rp *port, struct plda_evt *evt)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = port->dev;
>  	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> @@ -572,8 +572,8 @@ static int mc_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct plda_pcie_rp *port)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	port->event_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, NUM_EVENTS,
> -						   &event_domain_ops, port);
> +	port->event_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, port->num_events,
> +						   evt->domain_ops, port);
>  	if (!port->event_domain) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to get event domain\n");
>  		of_node_put(pcie_intc_node);
> @@ -658,14 +658,15 @@ static void mc_disable_interrupts(struct mc_pcie *port)
>  	writel_relaxed(GENMASK(31, 0), bridge_base_addr + ISTATUS_HOST);
>  }
>  
> -static int mc_init_interrupts(struct platform_device *pdev, struct plda_pcie_rp *port)
> +static int plda_init_interrupts(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				struct plda_pcie_rp *port, struct plda_evt *evt)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	int irq;
>  	int i, intx_irq, msi_irq, event_irq;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = mc_pcie_init_irq_domains(port);
> +	ret = plda_pcie_init_irq_domains(port, evt);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed creating IRQ domains\n");
>  		return ret;
> @@ -675,15 +676,18 @@ static int mc_init_interrupts(struct platform_device *pdev, struct plda_pcie_rp
>  	if (irq < 0)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < NUM_EVENTS; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < port->num_events; i++) {
>  		event_irq = irq_create_mapping(port->event_domain, i);
>  		if (!event_irq) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to map hwirq %d\n", i);
>  			return -ENXIO;
>  		}
>  
> -		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, event_irq, mc_event_handler,
> -				       0, event_cause[i].sym, port);
> +		if (evt->request_evt_irq)
> +			ret = evt->request_evt_irq(port, event_irq, i);
> +		else
> +			ret = devm_request_irq(dev, event_irq, plda_event_handler,
> +					       0, NULL, port);

Is there a particular reason this if/else addition ended up in this
patch, but the if/else addition in plda_handle_event() ended up in the
next one?

Otherwise, this looks fine to me.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)