lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230814141710.GL776869@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:17:10 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc:     Helge Deller <deller@....de>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
        lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Fix static memory detection even more

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 09:40:42PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed "BUG:key#has_not_been_registered" on:
> 
> commit: 94d4413e506da48ea18f1cc982202874d35c76b1 ("[PATCH] lockdep: Fix static memory detection even more")
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Helge-Deller/lockdep-Fix-static-memory-detection-even-more/20230812-235022
> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZNep5EcYskP9HtGD@p100/
> patch subject: [PATCH] lockdep: Fix static memory detection even more
> 
> in testcase: boot
> 
> compiler: gcc-12
> test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G
> 
> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
> 
> 
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202308141646.d3160c77-oliver.sang@intel.com
> 
> 
> 
> [    0.575811][    T1] BUG: key b35c282c has not been registered!
> [    0.576580][    T1] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    0.577216][    T1] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1)
> [    0.577236][    T1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4888 lockdep_init_map_type+0x155/0x250
> [    0.578389][    T1] Modules linked in:
> [    0.578856][    T1] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc4-00587-g94d4413e506d #2

> [    0.595653][    T1]  __kernfs_create_file+0x6a/0xe0
> [    0.596244][    T1]  sysfs_add_bin_file_mode_ns+0x4e/0xc0
> [    0.596891][    T1]  sysfs_create_bin_file+0x5c/0x90
> [    0.597496][    T1]  ? nsproxy_cache_init+0x30/0x30
> [    0.598090][    T1]  ksysfs_init+0x5c/0x90

Problem seems to be __ro_after_init. Your patch only considers
is_kernel_core_data(), which seems to not include these other fancy data
sections we have.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ