[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=Pr37R839NP1BQ2sO_x=fDER8KhYvcLvCNGJRZrKd9EUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 11:09:10 -0700
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: cachestat: use proper syscall number macro
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 8:56 AM Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> wrote:
>
> At the moment the cachestat syscall number is hard coded into the test
> source code.
> Remove that and replace it with the proper __NR_cachestat macro.
> That ensures compatibility should other architectures pick a different
> number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
> index 54d09b820ed4b..a5a4ac8dcb76c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ static const char * const dev_files[] = {
> "/dev/zero", "/dev/null", "/dev/urandom",
> "/proc/version", "/proc"
> };
> -static const int cachestat_nr = 451;
>
> void print_cachestat(struct cachestat *cs)
> {
> @@ -126,7 +125,7 @@ bool test_cachestat(const char *filename, bool write_random, bool create,
> }
> }
>
> - syscall_ret = syscall(cachestat_nr, fd, &cs_range, &cs, 0);
> + syscall_ret = syscall(__NR_cachestat, fd, &cs_range, &cs, 0);
>
> ksft_print_msg("Cachestat call returned %ld\n", syscall_ret);
>
> @@ -152,7 +151,7 @@ bool test_cachestat(const char *filename, bool write_random, bool create,
> ksft_print_msg("fsync fails.\n");
> ret = false;
> } else {
> - syscall_ret = syscall(cachestat_nr, fd, &cs_range, &cs, 0);
> + syscall_ret = syscall(__NR_cachestat, fd, &cs_range, &cs, 0);
>
> ksft_print_msg("Cachestat call (after fsync) returned %ld\n",
> syscall_ret);
> @@ -213,7 +212,7 @@ bool test_cachestat_shmem(void)
> goto close_fd;
> }
>
> - syscall_ret = syscall(cachestat_nr, fd, &cs_range, &cs, 0);
> + syscall_ret = syscall(__NR_cachestat, fd, &cs_range, &cs, 0);
>
> if (syscall_ret) {
> ksft_print_msg("Cachestat returned non-zero.\n");
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Oops something I forgot to fix. Thanks, Andre!
Reviewed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists