linux-kernel - [PATCH 08/12] s390/vfio-ap: handle queue state change in progress on reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230815184333.6554-9-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:43:29 -0400
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
        pasic@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com,
        Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] s390/vfio-ap: handle queue state change in progress on reset

A new APQSW response code (0xA) indicating the designated queue is in the
process of being bound or associated to a configuration may be returned
from the PQAP(ZAPQ) command. This patch introduces code that will verify
when the PQAP(ZAPQ) command can be re-issued after receiving response code
0xA.

Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@...ux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 3a59f1c5390f..43dea259fe23 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -1647,7 +1647,8 @@ static void apq_reset_check(struct work_struct *reset_work)
 					      status.irq_enabled);
 		} else {
 			if (q->reset_status.response_code == AP_RESPONSE_RESET_IN_PROGRESS ||
-			    q->reset_status.response_code == AP_RESPONSE_BUSY) {
+			    q->reset_status.response_code == AP_RESPONSE_BUSY ||
+			    q->reset_status.response_code == AP_RESPONSE_STATE_CHANGE_IN_PROGRESS) {
 				status = ap_zapq(q->apqn, 0);
 				memcpy(&q->reset_status, &status, sizeof(status));
 				continue;
@@ -1679,6 +1680,7 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
 	case AP_RESPONSE_NORMAL:
 	case AP_RESPONSE_RESET_IN_PROGRESS:
 	case AP_RESPONSE_BUSY:
+	case AP_RESPONSE_STATE_CHANGE_IN_PROGRESS:
 		/*
 		 * Let's verify whether the ZAPQ completed successfully on a work queue.
 		 */
-- 
2.39.3