[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230815203527.GB971582@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 22:35:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 - RESEND 02/10] arm64/perf: Add BRBE registers and
fields
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 02:05:36PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> From a quick dig, it's supposed to be like that: the GNU assembler uses a
> different operator precedence to C, and clang's assembler does the same for
> compatibility. What a great.
GNU assembler doesn't even have a consistent true value for boolean
expressions. The comparisons use -1/~0 as true value while the logical
ops use 1.
It's as if they purposefully want to mess you up :-(
https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.38/as.html#Infix-Ops
Powered by blists - more mailing lists