lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2023 11:51:45 +0800
From:   Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>
To:     Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>
Cc:     alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        kuba@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: stmmac: Tx coe sw fallback

From: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 15:06:37
> > > +	bool tx_q_coe_lmt;
> >
> > Please use a flag here instead of "tx_q_coe_lmt". This is the
> > preferrable method now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jose
> 
> Thanks Jose for the feedback. If I read that correctly, your suggestion is to
> change " tx_q_coe_lmt" to something more readable, like "has_txcoe_limit".
> Please correct me if I understand it wrongly.
> 
> BR,
> Rohan
>

Or, use int instead of bool?

BR,
Rohan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ