linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.191-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <04946479-9fce-d803-5734-ed8ce4bf2672@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2023 23:32:37 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/68] 5.10.191-rc1 review

Hello!

On 13/08/23 15:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.191 release.
> There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Tue, 15 Aug 2023 21:16:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.191-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

This branch exhibits the same problem with regards to x86 and Clang as reported on 6.4 [1], 6.1 [2] and 5.15 [3].

Other than that, rest looks good:

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.191-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 5b1776cc14bf85186ed45a8d68d33206f73c727e
* git describe: v5.10.190-69-g5b1776cc14bf
* test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.190-69-g5b1776cc14bf

## Test regressions (compared to v5.10.190)
* x86, log-parser-boot
   - check-kernel-warning
   
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## No metric regressions (compared to v5.10.190)

## No test fixes (compared to v5.10.190)

## No metric fixes (compared to v5.10.190)

## Test result summary
total: 124569, pass: 99567, fail: 3522, skip: 21366, xfail: 114

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 117 total, 116 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 0 passed, 4 failed
* powerpc: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/b2145971-5417-e1b1-40b4-f971e247e1ea@linaro.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/239281dd-3cb8-23de-9ea1-27e9c224cfbd@linaro.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/5a3f5686-b303-8c30-a637-787be94f6623@linaro.org/

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org