[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZNsez3oWNcT72PGy@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:44:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Extend device_get_match_data() to struct bus_type
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:46:10PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Extend device_get_match_data() to struct
> > bus_type
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 01:27:36PM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:05:10AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
...
> > > > I'm good with this approach, but make sure you checked the whole
> > > > kernel source tree for a such.
> > >
> > > Checking against 16 is too short I guess??
> > >
> > > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h has 18 enums.
> >
> > So, what does prevent us from moving that tables to use pointers?
>
> I think that will lead to ABI breakage(client->name vs id->name)
>
> match = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> if (match) {
> chip_type = (uintptr_t)match;
> name = client->name;
> } else if (id) {
> chip_type = (enum inv_devices)
> id->driver_data;
> name = id->name;
> } else {
> return -ENOSYS;
> }
It's easy to work around (may be better fix can be found, haven't checked, just
what first comes to my mind):
match ...
name = match->name;
/* If enumerated via firmware node, fix the ABI */
if (dev_fwnode())
client->name
> > > /*device enum */
> > > enum inv_devices {
> > > INV_MPU6050,
> > > INV_MPU6500,
> > > INV_MPU6515,
> > > INV_MPU6880,
> > > INV_MPU6000,
> > > INV_MPU9150,
> > > INV_MPU9250,
> > > INV_MPU9255,
> > > INV_ICM20608,
> > > INV_ICM20608D,
> > > INV_ICM20609,
> > > INV_ICM20689,
> > > INV_ICM20600,
> > > INV_ICM20602,
> > > INV_ICM20690,
> > > INV_IAM20680,
> > > INV_NUM_PARTS
> > > };
> > >
> > > The new helper function
> >
> > You mean for debugging? We don't need that in production.
>
> That is sample code for iterating through id table to find max enum
> and check against ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR
Much better with a coccinelle. You will find all or almost all occurrences
without too much effort done.
> > I think what you need is a coccinelle script to find these.
>
> I need to explore using coccinelle script as I have n't tried before.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists