[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZNsukMSQmzmXpgbS@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 15:51:44 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2@...wei.com>,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
timo.teras@....fi, yuehaibing@...wei.com, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net, v2] net: xfrm: skip policies marked as dead while
reinserting policies
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 10:30:33AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> But policy has, and we are not interested in validity of it as first
> check in if (...) will be true for policy->walk.dead.
>
> So it is safe to call to dir = xfrm_policy_id2dir(policy->index) even
> for dead policy.
If you dereference policy->index on a walker object it will read memory
before the start of the walker object. That could do anything, perhaps
even triggering a page fault.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists