lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:19:35 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     chengming.zhou@...ux.dev
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, kch@...dia.com,
        damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, bvanassche@....org,
        nj.shetty@...sung.com, kbusch@...nel.org,
        zhouchengming@...edance.com, akinobu.mita@...il.com,
        shinichiro.kawasaki@....com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] null_blk: fix poll request timeout handling

chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:

> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> 
> When doing io_uring benchmark on /dev/nullb0, it's easy to crash the
> kernel if poll requests timeout triggered, as reported by David. [1]
> 
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
> Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_timeout_work
> RIP: 0010:null_timeout_rq+0x4e/0x91
> Call Trace:
>  ? __die_body+0x1a/0x5c
>  ? page_fault_oops+0x6f/0x9c
>  ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0xc6/0xd6
>  ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x44/0x1eb
>  ? exc_page_fault+0xe2/0xf4
>  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
>  ? null_timeout_rq+0x4e/0x91
>  blk_mq_handle_expired+0x31/0x4b
>  bt_iter+0x68/0x84
>  ? bt_tags_iter+0x81/0x81
>  __sbitmap_for_each_set.constprop.0+0xb0/0xf2
>  ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0xf/0xf
>  bt_for_each+0x46/0x64
>  ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0xf/0xf
>  ? percpu_ref_get_many+0xc/0x2a
>  blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x14d/0x18e
>  blk_mq_timeout_work+0x95/0x127
>  process_one_work+0x185/0x263
>  worker_thread+0x1b5/0x227
>  ? rescuer_thread+0x287/0x287
>  kthread+0xfa/0x102
>  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x1b/0x1b
>  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> 
> This is indeed a race problem between null_timeout_rq() and null_poll().
> 
> null_poll()				null_timeout_rq()
>   spin_lock(&nq->poll_lock)
>   list_splice_init(&nq->poll_list, &list)
>   spin_unlock(&nq->poll_lock)
> 
>   while (!list_empty(&list))
>     req = list_first_entry()
>     list_del_init()
>     ...
>     blk_mq_add_to_batch()
>     // req->rq_next = NULL
> 					spin_lock(&nq->poll_lock)
> 
> 					// rq->queuelist->next == NULL
> 					list_del_init(&rq->queuelist)
> 
> 					spin_unlock(&nq->poll_lock)
> 
> What's worse is that we don't call blk_mq_complete_request_remote()
> before blk_mq_add_to_batch(), so these completed requests have wrong
> rq->state == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT. We can easily check this using bpftrace:
> 
> ```
> bpftrace -e 'kretfunc:null_blk:null_poll {
>   $iob=(struct io_comp_batch *)args->iob;
>   @[$iob->req_list->state]=count();
> }'
> 
> @[1]: 51708
> ```
> 
> Fix these problems by setting requests state to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE under
> nq->poll_lock protection, in which null_timeout_rq() can safely detect
> this race and early return.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3893581.1691785261@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
> 
> Fixes: 0a593fbbc245 ("null_blk: poll queue support")
> Reported-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>

Okay, the oops no longer seems to happen, so on that basis:

Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>


However, running:

	./fio/t/io_uring -n4 /dev/nullb0

and then interrupting it with ctrl-C after a while dumps a whole load of
messages into the dmesg log (excerpt attached).  It seems wrong that the user
should be able to generate a dump like this just by interrupting - but I guess
as it's null_blk it probably doesn't matter.

David
---
null_blk: rq 00000000bb2d3264 timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 328372624 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 00000000abcc1075 timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 378610072 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 00000000d4bdc71f timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 185005312 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 00000000f4ffddee timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 206118608 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 000000001e68b709 timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 310381160 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 00000000bfeafe97 timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 52036480 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 00000000aa67d21c timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 22746448 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 00000000faec1291 timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 391201440 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 00000000c634428c timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 237216136 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 0000000077f91a5d timed out
timeout error, dev nullb0, sector 453778912 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0xe00000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
null_blk: rq 000000003076467c timed out
null_blk: rq 000000009c172678 timed out
null_blk: rq 000000002df50b48 timed out
null_blk: rq 00000000e4c66900 timed out
null_blk: rq 0000000082606e31 timed out
null_blk: rq 00000000fe21ffdc timed out
null_blk: rq 000000005e5c5173 timed out
null_blk: rq 00000000b0a0d20c timed out
null_blk: rq 000000008c729e47 timed out
null_blk: rq 00000000970f75a0 timed out
null_blk: rq 000000002ad3c45a timed out

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ