[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZNtszQeigYuItaKA@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:17:17 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, david.laight@...lab.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
tanyuan@...ylab.org, thomas@...ch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] tools/nolibc: fix up size inflate regression
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 09:39:44PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > And we're done, you can then keep the simplified __sysret() macro for all
> > other call places.
> >
>
> Now, this issue is near to the end ;-)
I've now pushed the simplified fix (without changing the SET_ERRNO()
macro, enough last minute breaking changes for now) in branch
20230815-for-6.6-2.
The tests pass and riscv/loongarch are even very slightly smaller than
before (~8 bytes) but again that doesn't count as it depends on how the
compiler decides to arrange if/else branches.
I'll let Shuah know about these late fixes.
Regards,
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists