| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <30f6e625-cd3e-f846-e04d-667404f9f3c5@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 20:33:36 +0800
From: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Zhuo Song <zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] perf test: Add pmu-event test for "Compat" and new
event_field.
在 2023/8/15 上午9:11, Ian Rogers 写道:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 12:51 AM Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add new event test for uncore system event which is used to verify the
>> functionality of "Compat" matching multiple identifiers and the new event
>> fields "EventIdCode" and "Type".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> Did you test with NO_JEVENTS=1?
>
You are absolutely right. I completely overlooked the case where NO_JEVENTS=1.
>> ---
>> .../pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json | 8 ++++
>> tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json
>> index c7e7528..19ec595 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json
>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json
>> @@ -12,5 +12,13 @@
>> "EventName": "sys_ccn_pmu.read_cycles",
>> "Unit": "sys_ccn_pmu",
>> "Compat": "0x01"
>> + },
>> + {
>> + "BriefDescription": "Counts total cache misses in first lookup result (high priority).",
>> + "Type": "0x05",
>> + "EventIdCode": "0x01",
>> + "EventName": "sys_cmn_pmu.hnf_cache_miss",
>> + "Unit": "sys_cmn_pmu",
>> + "Compat": "434*;436*;43c*;43a01"
>
> I suspect this needs adding here:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/pmu-events/empty-pmu-events.c?h=perf-tools-next#n247
>
After adding the relevant code in empty-pmu-events.c, it can successfully test with NO_JEVENTS=1.
Thanks,
Jing
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>> }
>> ]
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
>> index 3204252..79fb3e2 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
>> @@ -255,9 +255,24 @@ struct perf_pmu_test_pmu {
>> .matching_pmu = "uncore_sys_ccn_pmu4",
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct perf_pmu_test_event sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss = {
>> + .event = {
>> + .name = "sys_cmn_pmu.hnf_cache_miss",
>> + .event = "type=0x05,eventid=0x01",
>> + .desc = "Counts total cache misses in first lookup result (high priority). Unit: uncore_sys_cmn_pmu ",
>> + .topic = "uncore",
>> + .pmu = "uncore_sys_cmn_pmu",
>> + .compat = "434*;436*;43c*;43a01",
>> + },
>> + .alias_str = "type=0x5,eventid=0x1",
>> + .alias_long_desc = "Counts total cache misses in first lookup result (high priority). Unit: uncore_sys_cmn_pmu ",
>> + .matching_pmu = "uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0",
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct perf_pmu_test_event *sys_events[] = {
>> &sys_ddr_pmu_write_cycles,
>> &sys_ccn_pmu_read_cycles,
>> + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss,
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>> @@ -704,6 +719,46 @@ static int __test_uncore_pmu_event_aliases(struct perf_pmu_test_pmu *test_pmu)
>> &sys_ccn_pmu_read_cycles,
>> },
>> },
>> + {
>> + .pmu = {
>> + .name = (char *)"uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0",
>> + .is_uncore = 1,
>> + .id = (char *)"43401",
>> + },
>> + .aliases = {
>> + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss,
>> + },
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .pmu = {
>> + .name = (char *)"uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0",
>> + .is_uncore = 1,
>> + .id = (char *)"43602",
>> + },
>> + .aliases = {
>> + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss,
>> + },
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .pmu = {
>> + .name = (char *)"uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0",
>> + .is_uncore = 1,
>> + .id = (char *)"43c03",
>> + },
>> + .aliases = {
>> + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss,
>> + },
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .pmu = {
>> + .name = (char *)"uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0",
>> + .is_uncore = 1,
>> + .id = (char *)"43a01",
>> + },
>> + .aliases = {
>> + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss,
>> + },
>> + }
>> };
>>
>> /* Test that aliases generated are as expected */
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists