[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZNuCTMg2NS4d3xhf@tissot.1015granger.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:49:00 -0400
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the nfsd-fixes
tree
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:06:27AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nfsd tree got a conflict in:
>
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
>
> between commit:
>
> c96e2a695e00 ("sunrpc: set the bv_offset of first bvec in svc_tcp_sendmsg")
>
> from the nfsd-fixes tree and commit:
>
> 62c25ceb29a6 ("SUNRPC: Convert svc_tcp_sendmsg to use bio_vecs directly")
>
> from the nfsd tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the latter) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
Thanks, using the latter is the correct fix. I will address this in
my repo, since c96e2a695e00 is destined for v6.5-rc soon.
> This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists