[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8548782-65bf-114e-afb9-f0450468f6a5@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:21:31 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: aw88261: Fix unitialized ret of
aw88261_reg_update()
On 15/08/2023 16:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 12:47:43PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> There is a branch in if() clause where aw88261_reg_update() could return
>> uninitialized value. Pounted out by W=1 clang build:
>
> This series appears to have two copies of every patch which *look*
> similar but I'm not 100% sure if that's the case or in general what's
> going on - could you please resend a clean copy, it's probably easier
> than figuring it out?
Sorry for that, I must have screwed something while sending. I'll rebase
(first patch seems to be already fixed by Arnd) and send again.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists