[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230815112023.5903355c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 11:20:23 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Lee Trager <lee@...ger.us>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the btrfs
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
fs/btrfs/inode.c
between commit:
ea6aa58a9229 ("btrfs: copy dir permission and time when creating a stub subvolume")
from the btrfs tree and commit:
2a9462de4352 ("btrfs: convert to ctime accessor functions")
from the vfs-brauner tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 06c9ad527458,db7e1a19bb67..000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@@ -5558,12 -5757,9 +5555,11 @@@ static struct inode *new_simple_dir(str
inode->i_opflags &= ~IOP_XATTR;
inode->i_fop = &simple_dir_operations;
inode->i_mode = S_IFDIR | S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR | S_IXUGO;
- inode->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
+ inode->i_mtime = inode_set_ctime_current(inode);
- inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime;
+ inode->i_atime = dir->i_atime;
- inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime;
BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime = inode->i_mtime;
+ inode->i_uid = dir->i_uid;
+ inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid;
return inode;
}
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists