lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17542518-42ff-46f6-8304-fb8a214bfa77@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:36:10 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Joel Selvaraj <joelselvaraj.oss@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>
Cc:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dang Huynh <danct12@...eup.net>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] Input: Add Novatek NT36xxx touchscreen driver

On 16.08.2023 03:09, Joel Selvaraj wrote:
> Hi Konrad Dybcio,
> 
> On 8/8/23 18:38, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>>
>> This is a driver for the Novatek in-cell touch controller and
>> supports various chips from the NT36xxx family, currently
>> including NT36525, NT36672A, NT36676F, NT36772 and NT36870.
> 
> In kernel v6.4, a basic novatek touchscreen driver was introduced [1].
> I was able to tweak IT a bit (add devicetree compatible, regulator support, remove chip id hardcode) and get it properly working in my Xiaomi Poco F1 which has Novatek NT36672A touchscreen. Probably the other ICs will also work. So, do we really need a separate touchscreen driver? Maybe the existing one can be improved to add more features if needed?
Do you have your end outcome somewhere?

I can take a look and compare if anything's missing..


> 
> Personally I have been looking forward to the v10 of this patchseries :) Thanks for working on this! But, yeah, we need to decide if we need this to be a separate driver.
We'll see, I was hoping I could add firmware loading, SPI transport and
eventually pen support..

Konrad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ