[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b917300-6be8-931c-a461-18737d72e3a0@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 20:06:34 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, rfoss@...nel.org,
todor.too@...il.com, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
andrey.konovalov@...aro.org
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/14] media: qcom: camss: Drop useless NULL assignment
for ispif resources
On 16/08/2023 18:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 14.08.2023 18:28, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> The NULL pointer assignement is a redundant step our compiler will
>> initialize unpopulated fields as zero. We check for logical ! later on
>> in the code as opposed to NULL anyway.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> ---
> Just squash it with patch 2?
>
> Konrad
Yeah but this is zapping an unnecessary NULL, the other patch is about
condensing down into one common structure. I kind of prefer to keep as
much granularity as possible.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists