[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c238ca2-691f-b69c-76d3-efac330570da@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:42:20 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Robin Jarry <rjarry@...hat.com>, Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] x86/speculation: Disable IBRS when idle
On 7/27/23 14:45, Waiman Long wrote:
> v6:
> - Fix allyesconfig build error by moving __update_spec_ctrl()
> helper from nospec-branch.h to spec-ctrl.h and include it in files
> that need the helper.
>
> v5:
> - Update comment in patch 1.
> - Minor doc update and code twist in patch 4 as suggested by Peter and
> Randy.
>
> v4:
> - Add a new __update_spec_ctrl() helper in patch 1.
> - Rebased to the latest linux kernel.
>
> v3:
> - Drop patches 1 ("x86/speculation: Provide a debugfs file to dump
> SPEC_CTRL MSRs") and 5 ("x86/idle: Disable IBRS entering mwait idle
> and enable it on wakeup") for now.
> - Drop the MSR restoration code in ("x86/idle: Disable IBRS when cpu
> is offline") as native_play_dead() does not return.
> - For patch ("intel_idle: Add ibrs_off module parameter to force
> disable IBRS"), change the name from "no_ibrs" to "ibrs_off" and
> document the new parameter in intel_idle.rst.
>
> For Intel processors that need to turn on IBRS to protect against
> Spectre v2 and Retbleed, the IBRS bit in the SPEC_CTRL MSR affects
> the performance of the whole core even if only one thread is turning
> it on when running in the kernel. For user space heavy applications,
> the performance impact of occasionally turning IBRS on during syscalls
> shouldn't be significant. Unfortunately, that is not the case when the
> sibling thread is idling in the kernel. In that case, the performance
> impact can be significant.
>
> When DPDK is running on an isolated CPU thread processing network packets
> in user space while its sibling thread is idle. The performance of the
> busy DPDK thread with IBRS on and off in the sibling idle thread are:
>
> IBRS on IBRS off
> ------- --------
> packets/second: 7.8M 10.4M
> avg tsc cycles/packet: 282.26 209.86
>
> This is a 25% performance degradation. The test system is a Intel Xeon
> 4114 CPU @ 2.20GHz.
>
> Commit bf5835bcdb96 ("intel_idle: Disable IBRS during long idle")
> disables IBRS when the CPU enters long idle (C6 or below). However, there
> are existing users out there who have set "intel_idle.max_cstate=1"
> to decrease latency. Those users won't be able to benefit from this
> commit. This patch series extends this commit by providing a new
> "intel_idle.ibrs_off" module parameter to force disable IBRS even when
> "intel_idle.max_cstate=1" at the expense of increased IRQ response
> latency. It also includes a commit to allow the disabling of IBRS when
> a CPU becomes offline.
>
> Waiman Long (4):
> x86/speculation: Add __update_spec_ctrl() helper
> x86/idle: Disable IBRS when cpu is offline
> intel_idle: Use __update_spec_ctrl() in intel_idle_ibrs()
> intel_idle: Add ibrs_off module parameter to force disable IBRS
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/spec-ctrl.h | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
Peter,
Is this patch series good enough to be merged?
Thanks,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists