[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR21MB1335F165EF353A24E4CCF6F0BF15A@SA1PR21MB1335.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 21:42:52 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
CC: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 7/8] x86/hyperv: Add smp support for SEV-SNP guest
> From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 8:59 AM
> [...]
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> @@ -295,6 +295,16 @@ static void __init hv_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned
> int max_cpus)
>
> native_smp_prepare_cpus(max_cpus);
> [...]
> + if (hv_isolation_type_en_snp())
> + apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 = hv_snp_boot_ap;
> +
> + if (!hv_root_partition)
> + return;
Can the above be changed to:
if (hv_isolation_type_en_snp()) {
apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 = hv_snp_boot_ap;
return;
}
(please also see the below)
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> if (i == 0)
> @@ -502,8 +512,7 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
>
> # ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> smp_ops.smp_prepare_boot_cpu = hv_smp_prepare_boot_cpu;
> - if (hv_root_partition)
> - smp_ops.smp_prepare_cpus = hv_smp_prepare_cpus;
> + smp_ops.smp_prepare_cpus = hv_smp_prepare_cpus;
IMO it's better if we don't unconditionally change smp_ops.smp_prepare_cpus.
How about this:
if (hv_root_partition || hv_isolation_type_en_snp())
smp_ops.smp_prepare_cpus = hv_smp_prepare_cpus;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists