linux-kernel - [PATCH v12 3/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230816204143.66281-4-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:41:37 -0500
From:   Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Iain Lane" <iain@...ngesquash.org.uk>,
        Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 3/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints

There is no reason for the variables to be pre-incremented.
No intended functional changes.

Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
---
 drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
index ce62e61a9605e..7711dde68947f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
@@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints_amd(void)
 			acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle,
 					  "LPI: constraints list begin:\n");
 
-			for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) {
+			for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) {
 				union acpi_object *info_obj = &package->package.elements[j];
 				struct lpi_device_constraint_amd dev_info = {};
 				struct lpi_constraints *list;
 				acpi_status status;
 
-				for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; ++k) {
+				for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; k++) {
 					union acpi_object *obj = &info_obj->package.elements[k];
 
 					list = &lpi_constraints_table[lpi_constraints_table_size];
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void)
 		if (!package)
 			continue;
 
-		for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) {
+		for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) {
 			union acpi_object *element =
 					&(package->package.elements[j]);
 
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void)
 
 		constraint->min_dstate = -1;
 
-		for (j = 0; j < package_count; ++j) {
+		for (j = 0; j < package_count; j++) {
 			union acpi_object *info_obj = &info.package[j];
 			union acpi_object *cnstr_pkg;
 			union acpi_object *obj;
-- 
2.34.1