| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALTww2-LzW76_=vH+TKjZGzChrsz_JJKJxh1-+SCNZ9NHv0N2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:38:33 +0800
From: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: song@...nel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 3/7] md: delay choosing sync direction to md_start_sync()
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:13 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> Before this patch, for read-write array:
>
> 1) md_check_recover() found that something need to be done, and it'll
> try to grab 'reconfig_mutex'. The case that md_check_recover() need
> to do something:
> - array is not suspend;
> - super_block need to be updated;
> - 'MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED' or ''MD_RECOVERY_DONE' is set;
> - unusual case related to safemode;
>
> 2) if 'MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING' is not set, and 'MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED' is set,
> md_check_recover() will try to choose a sync direction, and then
> queue a work md_start_sync().
>
> 3) md_start_sync() register sync_thread;
>
> After this patch,
>
> 1) is the same;
> 2) if 'MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING' is not set, and 'MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED' is set,
> queue a work md_start_sync() directly;
> 3) md_start_sync() will try to choose a sync direction, and then
> register sync_thread();
>
> Because 'MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING' is cleared when sync_thread is done, 2)
> and 3) is always ran in serial and they can never concurrent, this
> change should not introduce any behavior change for now.
>
> Also fix a problem that md_start_sync() can clear 'MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING'
> without protection in error path, which might affect the logical in
> md_check_recovery().
>
> The advantage to change this is that array reconfiguration is
> independent from daemon now, and it'll be much easier to synchronize it
> with io, consider that io may rely on daemon thread to be done.
Hi Kuai
What's the meaning of "array reconfiguration" here? "mdadm -f/-r/-a"
something like this, right?. Because before and after this patch, only
one sync thread can be running, so If we don't do this change, are
there bugs or performance problems?
If it's only a patch that wants to make md_check_recovery more clearer
and easier, I'm good with this idea too.
Best Regards
Xiao
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/md.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 4846ff6d25b0..03615b0e9fe1 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -9291,6 +9291,22 @@ static bool md_choose_sync_direction(struct mddev *mddev, int *spares)
> static void md_start_sync(struct work_struct *ws)
> {
> struct mddev *mddev = container_of(ws, struct mddev, sync_work);
> + int spares = 0;
> +
> + mddev_lock_nointr(mddev);
> +
> + if (!md_choose_sync_direction(mddev, &spares))
> + goto not_running;
> +
> + if (!mddev->pers->sync_request)
> + goto not_running;
> +
> + /*
> + * We are adding a device or devices to an array which has the bitmap
> + * stored on all devices. So make sure all bitmap pages get written.
> + */
> + if (spares)
> + md_bitmap_write_all(mddev->bitmap);
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(mddev->sync_thread,
> md_register_thread(md_do_sync, mddev, "resync"));
> @@ -9298,20 +9314,27 @@ static void md_start_sync(struct work_struct *ws)
> pr_warn("%s: could not start resync thread...\n",
> mdname(mddev));
> /* leave the spares where they are, it shouldn't hurt */
> - clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery);
> - clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery);
> - clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery);
> - clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery);
> - clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
> - wake_up(&resync_wait);
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER,
> - &mddev->recovery))
> - if (mddev->sysfs_action)
> - sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_action);
> - } else
> - md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread);
> + goto not_running;
> + }
> +
> + mddev_unlock(mddev);
> + md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread);
> sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_action);
> md_new_event();
> + return;
> +
> +not_running:
> + clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery);
> + clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery);
> + clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery);
> + clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery);
> + clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
> + mddev_unlock(mddev);
> +
> + wake_up(&resync_wait);
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER, &mddev->recovery) &&
> + mddev->sysfs_action)
> + sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_action);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -9379,7 +9402,6 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
> return;
>
> if (mddev_trylock(mddev)) {
> - int spares = 0;
> bool try_set_sync = mddev->safemode != 0;
>
> if (!mddev->external && mddev->safemode == 1)
> @@ -9467,29 +9489,11 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
> clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery);
>
> if (!test_and_clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery) ||
> - test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery))
> - goto not_running;
> - if (!md_choose_sync_direction(mddev, &spares))
> - goto not_running;
> - if (mddev->pers->sync_request) {
> - if (spares) {
> - /* We are adding a device or devices to an array
> - * which has the bitmap stored on all devices.
> - * So make sure all bitmap pages get written
> - */
> - md_bitmap_write_all(mddev->bitmap);
> - }
> + test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery)) {
> queue_work(md_misc_wq, &mddev->sync_work);
> - goto unlock;
> - }
> - not_running:
> - if (!mddev->sync_thread) {
> + } else {
> clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
> wake_up(&resync_wait);
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER,
> - &mddev->recovery))
> - if (mddev->sysfs_action)
> - sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_action);
> }
> unlock:
> wake_up(&mddev->sb_wait);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists