[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230816091707.GA980931@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:17:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: cleanup: Make no_free_ptr() __must_check
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 08:00:17AM +0000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I think it needs to be something like
>
> #define __get_and_free_ptr(p) \
> ({ __auto_type __ptr = &(p); \
> __auto_type __val = *__ptr; \
> *__ptr = NULL; __val; })
>
> static inline __must_check
> const volatile void * __must_check_fn(const volatile void *val)
> { return val; }
>
> #define no_free_ptr(p) \
> ((typeof(p)) __must_check_fn(__get_and_free_ptr(p)))
>
> the above is entirely untested. Of course.
That works and is *much* saner than the horrible thing I did.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists