linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 2/2] PCI: rcar-host: add support for optional regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:51:13 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 2/2] PCI: rcar-host: add support for optional
 regulators

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:34:01AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > The KingFisher board has regulators. They just need to be en-/disabled,
> > so we can leave the handling to devm. Order variables in reverse-xmas
> > while we are here.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> 
> Krzysztof or Lorenzo may fix this up for you, but:
> s/add support/Add support/ in subject to match history
> and recast commit log to say what the patch *does* ("enable optional
> regulators using devm, so devm will automatically disable them when
> the driver releases the device"), not *what needs to be done*.

I will fix the commit messages and resend. But frankly, except the
latter is a tad more explicit, they both qualify for "what needs to be
done" for me *shrug* Still, thanks for the review, I appreciate it!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)