[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d42b4db3-d36d-d8fd-90ca-e00c2151195c@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 18:38:44 -0700
From: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<mathias.nyman@...el.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
<tiwai@...e.com>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
<bgoswami@...cinc.com>, <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<quic_jackp@...cinc.com>, <oneukum@...e.com>,
<albertccwang@...gle.com>, <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 31/32] sound: usb: card: Allow for rediscovery of
connected USB SND devices
Hi Pierre,
On 7/25/2023 2:15 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
> On 7/25/23 04:34, Wesley Cheng wrote:
>> In case of notifying SND platform drivers of connection events, some of
>> these use cases, such as offloading, require an ASoC USB backend device to
>> be initialized before the events can be handled. If the USB backend device
>> has not yet been probed, this leads to missing initial USB audio device
>> connection events.
>>
>> Expose an API that traverses the usb_chip array for connected devices, and
>> to call the respective connection callback registered to the SND platform
>> driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> sound/usb/card.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> sound/usb/card.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/usb/card.c b/sound/usb/card.c
>> index 365f6d978608..27a89aaa0bf3 100644
>> --- a/sound/usb/card.c
>> +++ b/sound/usb/card.c
>> @@ -170,6 +170,25 @@ struct snd_usb_stream *snd_usb_find_suppported_substream(int card_idx,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_usb_find_suppported_substream);
>>
>> +/*
>> + * in case the platform driver was not ready at the time of USB SND
>> + * device connect, expose an API to discover all connected USB devices
>> + * so it can populate any dependent resources/structures.
>> + */
>> +void snd_usb_rediscover_devices(void)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(®ister_mutex);
>> + for (i = 0; i < SNDRV_CARDS; i++) {
>> + if (usb_chip[i])
>> + if (platform_ops && platform_ops->connect_cb)
>> + platform_ops->connect_cb(usb_chip[i]);
>
> what happens if the USB device is removed while the platform device adds
> a port?
>
> This sounds super-racy to me. It's the same set of problems we're having
> between audio and display/DRM, I would be surprised if this function
> dealt with all corner cases of insertion/removal, bind/unbind.
>
The chip array entries are all populated and removed while under the
register_mutex, so going over your race condition, we should see:
Thread#1:
q6usb_component_probe()
--> snd_soc_usb_add_port()
--> snd_usb_rediscover_devices()
--> mutex_lock(register_mutex)
Thread#2
--> usb_audio_disconnect()
--> mutex_lock(register_mutex)
So either thread#1 or thread#2 will complete first. If
Thread#1 completes before thread#2:
SOC USB will notify DPCM backend of the device connection. Shortly
after, once thread#2 runs, we will get a disconnect event for the
connected device.
Thread#2 completes before thread#1:
Then during snd_usb_rediscover_devices() we won't notify of any
connection for that particular chip index.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists