[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b083c649-0032-4501-54eb-1d86af5fd4c8@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:39:41 +0200
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] s390/vfio_ap: crypto pass-through for SE guests
On 8/15/23 20:43, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> This patch series is for the changes required in the vfio_ap device
> driver to facilitate pass-through of crypto devices to a secure
> execution guest. In particular, it is critical that no data from the
> queues passed through to the SE guest is leaked when the guest is
> destroyed. There are also some new response codes returned from the
> PQAP(ZAPQ) and PQAP(TAPQ) commands that have been added to the
> architecture in support of pass-through of crypto devices to SE guests;
> these need to be accounted for when handling the reset of queues.
>
@Heiko: Once this has soaked a day or two, could you please apply this
and create a feature branch that I can pull from?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists