[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <500a73ea-98e9-4b85-a34f-88a7bd98550d@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:10:19 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"Valentin Caron" <valentin.caron@...s.st.com>
Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: stm32: Use NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS()
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, at 13:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n (e.g. m68k/allmodconfig):
>
> drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:904:12: error: ‘stm32_rtc_resume’ defined
> but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> 904 | static int stm32_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:894:12: error: ‘stm32_rtc_suspend’ defined
> but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> 894 | static int stm32_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Indeed, the previous change mixed up the semantics between
> SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() and NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS().
> Fix this by using the modern NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() instead.
>
> Reported-by: noreply@...erman.id.au
> Fixes: a69c610e13e2b2de ("rtc: stm32: remove incorrect #ifdef check")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists