linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] s390/ipl: fix virtual vs physical address confusion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:44:19 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] s390/ipl: fix virtual vs physical address confusion

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 03:29:42PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> The value of ipl_cert_list_addr boot variable contains
> a physical address, which is used directly. That works
> because virtual and physical address spaces are currently
> the same, but otherwise it is wrong.
> 
> While at it, fix also a comment for the platform keyring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c             | 4 ++--
>  arch/s390/kernel/setup.c                          | 2 +-
>  security/integrity/platform_certs/load_ipl_s390.c | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Mimi, Jarkko, any objections from your side?
I would take this via the s390 tree.