linux-kernel - Re: Possible nvme regression in 6.4.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <144d4c08-2cd4-4d77-acb5-5c89d8dede46@sapience.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:43:55 -0400
From:   Genes Lists <lists@...ience.com>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, sagi@...mberg.me,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, hch@....de, arnd@...db.de,
        ricky_wu@...ltek.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: Possible nvme regression in 6.4.11

On 8/17/23 13:28, Keith Busch wrote:
...
>>>
>>> Bisect done - This is result:
> 
> Sounds like the driver's ASPM suspicion was justified, however the
> recommended work-around doesn't appear to apply to this hardware.
> Thanks for running the bisect!

Happy to help :)

gene