linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 9/9] PCI: ACPI: Use device constraints to decide PCI target state fallback policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ac4ee07-9328-415f-a4e8-30dfd9c10fee@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:31:35 -0500
From:   "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Iain Lane <iain@...ngesquash.org.uk>,
        Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 9/9] PCI: ACPI: Use device constraints to decide PCI
 target state fallback policy


>> I was intentionally trying to leave the actual problem out of the commit
>> from your earlier feedback and just put it in the cover letter.
>>
>> But if it's better to keep in the commit message I'll return those details.
> 
> It is.
> 
> If you make a change in order to address a specific problem, that
> problem needs to be described in the changelog of the patch making
> that change.
> 
> Anything else is more or less confusing IMO.

Thanks. I'll write up a new commit message for v13 once I have some 
feedback on the approach of 'v11' vs the 'approach of 'v12'.