[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230817113853.4b47e636@hermes.local>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:38:53 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Michele Dalle Rive <dallerivemichele@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Davide Rovelli <davide.rovelli@....ch>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Rust Socket abstractions
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 19:14:19 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> If I understood correctly from Zulip, you cannot (right now) show your
> use case because it is confidential and therefore you cannot upstream
> it, so we will need another user (and, of course, that is a necessary
> but not sufficient condition for the code to be accepted).
I thought Rust symbols were all export symbol GPL.
And therefore any Rust module using these must also be GPL.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists