lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07ef59db-da17-15cf-789a-7f5d01b2c9c9@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:41:04 +0200
From:   Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@....com>
To:     André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@....com,
        'Marek Olšák' <maraeo@...il.com>,
        Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@...il.com>,
        Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@...il.com>,
        kernel-dev@...lia.com, alexander.deucher@....com,
        christian.koenig@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/amdgpu: Rework coredump to use memory
 dynamically

Hello Andre,

On 15/08/2023 21:50, André Almeida wrote:
> Instead of storing coredump information inside amdgpu_device struct,
> move if to a proper separated struct and allocate it dynamically. This
> will make it easier to further expand the logged information.
>
> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>
> ---
> v4: change kmalloc to kzalloc
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h        | 14 +++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 63 ++++++++++++++--------
>   2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> index 9c6a332261ab..0d560b713948 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> @@ -1088,11 +1088,6 @@ struct amdgpu_device {
>   	uint32_t                        *reset_dump_reg_list;
>   	uint32_t			*reset_dump_reg_value;
>   	int                             num_regs;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
> -	struct amdgpu_task_info         reset_task_info;
> -	bool                            reset_vram_lost;
> -	struct timespec64               reset_time;
> -#endif
>   
>   	bool                            scpm_enabled;
>   	uint32_t                        scpm_status;
> @@ -1105,6 +1100,15 @@ struct amdgpu_device {
>   	uint32_t			aid_mask;
>   };
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
> +struct amdgpu_coredump_info {
> +	struct amdgpu_device		*adev;
> +	struct amdgpu_task_info         reset_task_info;
> +	struct timespec64               reset_time;
> +	bool                            reset_vram_lost;
> +};

The patch looks good to me in general, but I would recommend slightly 
different arrangement and segregation of GPU reset information.

Please consider a higher level structure adev->gpu_reset_info, and move 
everything related to reset dump info into that, including this new 
coredump_info structure, something like this:

struct amdgpu_reset_info {

     uint32_t *reset_dump_reg_list;

     uint32_t *reset_dump_reg_value;

     int num_regs;

#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP

    struct amdgpu_coredump_info *coredump_info;/* keep this dynamic 
allocation */

#endif

}


This will make sure that all the relevant information is at the same place.

- Shashank

> +#endif
> +
>   static inline struct amdgpu_device *drm_to_adev(struct drm_device *ddev)
>   {
>   	return container_of(ddev, struct amdgpu_device, ddev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index bf4781551f88..b5b879bcc5c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -4799,12 +4799,17 @@ static int amdgpu_reset_reg_dumps(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
> +#ifndef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
> +static void amdgpu_coredump(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool vram_lost,
> +			    struct amdgpu_reset_context *reset_context)
> +{
> +}
> +#else
>   static ssize_t amdgpu_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
>   		size_t count, void *data, size_t datalen)
>   {
>   	struct drm_printer p;
> -	struct amdgpu_device *adev = data;
> +	struct amdgpu_coredump_info *coredump = data;
>   	struct drm_print_iterator iter;
>   	int i;
>   
> @@ -4818,21 +4823,21 @@ static ssize_t amdgpu_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
>   	drm_printf(&p, "**** AMDGPU Device Coredump ****\n");
>   	drm_printf(&p, "kernel: " UTS_RELEASE "\n");
>   	drm_printf(&p, "module: " KBUILD_MODNAME "\n");
> -	drm_printf(&p, "time: %lld.%09ld\n", adev->reset_time.tv_sec, adev->reset_time.tv_nsec);
> -	if (adev->reset_task_info.pid)
> +	drm_printf(&p, "time: %lld.%09ld\n", coredump->reset_time.tv_sec, coredump->reset_time.tv_nsec);
> +	if (coredump->reset_task_info.pid)
>   		drm_printf(&p, "process_name: %s PID: %d\n",
> -			   adev->reset_task_info.process_name,
> -			   adev->reset_task_info.pid);
> +			   coredump->reset_task_info.process_name,
> +			   coredump->reset_task_info.pid);
>   
> -	if (adev->reset_vram_lost)
> +	if (coredump->reset_vram_lost)
>   		drm_printf(&p, "VRAM is lost due to GPU reset!\n");
> -	if (adev->num_regs) {
> +	if (coredump->adev->num_regs) {
>   		drm_printf(&p, "AMDGPU register dumps:\nOffset:     Value:\n");
>   
> -		for (i = 0; i < adev->num_regs; i++)
> +		for (i = 0; i < coredump->adev->num_regs; i++)
>   			drm_printf(&p, "0x%08x: 0x%08x\n",
> -				   adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i],
> -				   adev->reset_dump_reg_value[i]);
> +				   coredump->adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i],
> +				   coredump->adev->reset_dump_reg_value[i]);
>   	}
>   
>   	return count - iter.remain;
> @@ -4840,14 +4845,32 @@ static ssize_t amdgpu_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
>   
>   static void amdgpu_devcoredump_free(void *data)
>   {
> +	kfree(data);
>   }
>   
> -static void amdgpu_reset_capture_coredumpm(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> +static void amdgpu_coredump(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool vram_lost,
> +			    struct amdgpu_reset_context *reset_context)
>   {
> +	struct amdgpu_coredump_info *coredump;
>   	struct drm_device *dev = adev_to_drm(adev);
>   
> -	ktime_get_ts64(&adev->reset_time);
> -	dev_coredumpm(dev->dev, THIS_MODULE, adev, 0, GFP_NOWAIT,
> +	coredump = kzalloc(sizeof(*coredump), GFP_NOWAIT);
> +
> +	if (!coredump) {
> +		DRM_ERROR("%s: failed to allocate memory for coredump\n", __func__);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	coredump->reset_vram_lost = vram_lost;
> +
> +	if (reset_context->job && reset_context->job->vm)
> +		coredump->reset_task_info = reset_context->job->vm->task_info;
> +
> +	coredump->adev = adev;
> +
> +	ktime_get_ts64(&coredump->reset_time);
> +
> +	dev_coredumpm(dev->dev, THIS_MODULE, coredump, 0, GFP_NOWAIT,
>   		      amdgpu_devcoredump_read, amdgpu_devcoredump_free);
>   }
>   #endif
> @@ -4955,15 +4978,9 @@ int amdgpu_do_asic_reset(struct list_head *device_list_handle,
>   					goto out;
>   
>   				vram_lost = amdgpu_device_check_vram_lost(tmp_adev);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
> -				tmp_adev->reset_vram_lost = vram_lost;
> -				memset(&tmp_adev->reset_task_info, 0,
> -						sizeof(tmp_adev->reset_task_info));
> -				if (reset_context->job && reset_context->job->vm)
> -					tmp_adev->reset_task_info =
> -						reset_context->job->vm->task_info;
> -				amdgpu_reset_capture_coredumpm(tmp_adev);
> -#endif
> +
> +				amdgpu_coredump(tmp_adev, vram_lost, reset_context);
> +
>   				if (vram_lost) {
>   					DRM_INFO("VRAM is lost due to GPU reset!\n");
>   					amdgpu_inc_vram_lost(tmp_adev);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ