[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaTn+Hj6_tiS1GGvwfcyeH5UGD6Q0K0pDpaV1Dk+WVRvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:00:16 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio: cdev: bail out of poll() if the device goes down
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 6:41 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> My preference would be for a separate nb for the chip removal to keep
> those two classes of events distinct.
That's a good point. Bart do you think you can rework it as such?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists