[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230817092353.GB176609@leoy-huanghe.lan>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 17:23:53 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Ming Wang <wangming01@...ngson.cn>,
Eric Lin <eric.lin@...ive.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
Ivan Babrou <ivan@...udflare.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] perf parse-regs: Refactor architecture functions
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 08:48:30AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
[...]
> > And move that to perf-tools-next, we can go on from there.
> >
> > The above is because we don't define CONFIG_PERF_REGS for these
> > architectures and thus that variable ends up not being used, so I'm
> > fixing up like below, in the cset where you made DWARF_MINIMAL_REGS
> > receive the arch parameter.
>
> I added this to the cset commit message:
>
> Committer notes:
>
> Make DWARF_MINIMAL_REGS() an inline function, so that we can use the
> __maybe_unused attribute for the 'arch' parameter, as this will avoid a
> build failure when that variable is unused in the callers. That happens
> when building on unsupported architectures, the ones without
> HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT defined.
Looks good to me, thanks for fixing.
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists