lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230817094520.21286-4-Huangzheng.Lai@unisoc.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 17:45:15 +0800
From:   Huangzheng Lai <Huangzheng.Lai@...soc.com>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
CC:     Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        huangzheng lai <laihuangzheng@...il.com>,
        Huangzheng Lai <Huangzheng.Lai@...soc.com>,
        Xiongpeng Wu <xiongpeng.wu@...soc.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] i2c: sprd: Use global variables to record IIC ack/nack status instead of local variables

We found that when the interrupt bit of the IIC controller is cleared,
the ack/nack bit is also cleared at the same time. After clearing the
interrupt bit in sprd_i2c_isr(), incorrect ack/nack information will be
obtained in sprd_i2c_isr_thread(), resulting in incorrect communication
when nack cannot be recognized. To solve this problem, we used a global
variable to record ack/nack information before clearing the interrupt
bit instead of a local variable.

Signed-off-by: Huangzheng Lai <Huangzheng.Lai@...soc.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c
index 066b3a9c30c8..549b60dd3273 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct sprd_i2c {
 	struct clk *clk;
 	u32 src_clk;
 	u32 bus_freq;
+	bool ack_flag;
 	struct completion complete;
 	struct reset_control *rst;
 	u8 *buf;
@@ -384,7 +385,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_i2c_isr_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id;
 	struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
-	bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK);
 	u32 i2c_tran;
 
 	if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_i2c_isr_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	 * For reading data, ack is always true, if i2c_tran is not 0 which
 	 * means we still need to contine to read data from slave.
 	 */
-	if (i2c_tran && ack) {
+	if (i2c_tran && i2c_dev->ack_flag) {
 		sprd_i2c_data_transfer(i2c_dev);
 		return IRQ_HANDLED;
 	}
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_i2c_isr_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	 * If we did not get one ACK from slave when writing data, we should
 	 * return -EIO to notify users.
 	 */
-	if (!ack)
+	if (!i2c_dev->ack_flag)
 		i2c_dev->err = -EIO;
 	else if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD && i2c_dev->count)
 		sprd_i2c_read_bytes(i2c_dev, i2c_dev->buf, i2c_dev->count);
@@ -428,7 +428,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id;
 	struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
-	bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK);
 	u32 i2c_tran;
 
 	if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
@@ -447,7 +446,8 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	 * means we can read all data in one time, then we can finish this
 	 * transmission too.
 	 */
-	if (!i2c_tran || !ack) {
+	i2c_dev->ack_flag = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK);
+	if (!i2c_tran || !i2c_dev->ack_flag) {
 		sprd_i2c_clear_start(i2c_dev);
 		sprd_i2c_clear_irq(i2c_dev);
 	}
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ