[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AxmSEF2=G_jNnFkvA4SbAr28W78UtpaOmWQ-fn86P9Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:38:29 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, aford@...conembedded.com,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mp: Fix SDMA2/3 clocks
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:34 AM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> I tried to do that with the fixes tag below. Do you want me to
> re-submit the patches with this changed? I was hoping to avoid
> referencing the same patch and hash twice in the same commit message.
IMHO there is no problem at all by referencing the same commit hash twice.
In fact, it makes it clearer as to what exactly you are referencing.
Please re-submit it, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists