linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] kselftest: Add Devicetree unprobed devices test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:26:05 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cocci@...ia.fr,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        kernelci@...ts.linux.dev, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] kselftest: Add Devicetree unprobed devices test

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 10:16:52AM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:54:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This doesn't appear to produce KTAP output which is going to make it
> > less useful for generic kselftest runners.

> Right, I'm going to need to rewrite it in C for that, but since I already had
> the shell script done, I decided to send it as is for the RFC, since I wanted to
> get feedback on the general approach more than anything.

I'm not clear why KTAP would require C?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)