[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <117448a6-671e-4f30-90c6-808a319caf32@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:26:05 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cocci@...ia.fr,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
kernelci@...ts.linux.dev, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] kselftest: Add Devicetree unprobed devices test
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 10:16:52AM -0400, NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:54:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This doesn't appear to produce KTAP output which is going to make it
> > less useful for generic kselftest runners.
> Right, I'm going to need to rewrite it in C for that, but since I already had
> the shell script done, I decided to send it as is for the RFC, since I wanted to
> get feedback on the general approach more than anything.
I'm not clear why KTAP would require C?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists