[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DU0PR04MB9417B3FE767FA06FFFEE018A881AA@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:13:01 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"frowand.list@...il.com" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] of/platform: increase refcount of fwnode
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/platform: increase refcount of fwnode
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 01:57:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 08:24:11PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > - device_set_node(&dev->dev, of_fwnode_handle(node));
> > > + device_set_node(&dev->dev, fwnode_handle_get(fwnode));
> >
> > Ditto.
>
> Actually no, amba_device_alloc() does not use platform_device_alloc() and
> defines it's own .release method. There is no reference count drop there
> AFAICS.
My test only covers platform device, so ..
But I have a general question here. Since of_amba_device_create will use
the of_node or fwnode, shouldn't the refcount_t be increased and released
in amba device release?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists