[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZN4sE4eC6C61B3WE@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:17:55 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFE: perf lock contention --bpf on an RT kernel
Em Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:57:25AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Hi Namhyung, I noticed this when trying to use the BPF mode of perf lock
> contention on an RT kernel:
>
>
> I tried up to now the following patch, it loads, but produces no output
> :-\
To check that a BPF skel based programs works with this kernel I tried:
[root@...e perf-tools-next]# uname -a
Linux nine 5.14.0-284.18.1.rt14.303.el9_2.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT Wed May 31 13:18:55 EDT 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@...e perf-tools-next]# tools/bpf/runqslower/.output/runqslower 50 | head -20
Tracing run queue latency higher than 50 us
TIME COMM PID LAT(us)
11:13:47 ktimers/5 60 54
11:13:47 irq_work/5 62 124
11:13:47 ktimers/5 60 53
11:13:47 irq_work/5 62 88
11:13:47 swapper/0 3942 59
11:13:47 ktimers/4 52 55
11:13:47 irq_work/4 54 102
11:13:47 swapper/0 3942 51
11:13:47 ktimers/5 60 54
11:13:47 irq_work/5 62 93
11:13:47 swapper/0 3942 51
11:13:47 kworker/2:2 38 141
11:13:47 swapper/4 14 90
11:13:47 swapper/6 642 102
11:13:47 swapper/7 77 52
11:13:47 ktimers/7 76 103
11:13:47 irq_work/7 78 92
11:13:47 ktimers/6 68 83
[root@...e perf-tools-next]#
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists