[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19414ebc-1c33-4482-965d-681f15f06654@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:12:39 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Baojun Xu <baojun.xu@...com>, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, shenghao-ding@...com, kevin-lu@...com,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, rf@...nsource.cirrus.com,
shumingf@...ltek.com, herve.codina@...tlin.com,
povik+lin@...ebit.org, ryans.lee@...log.com,
ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com,
fido_max@...ox.ru, wangweidong.a@...nic.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
peeyush@...com, navada@...com, tiwai@...e.de,
mengdong.lin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: tas2783: Add source files for tas2783 soundwire
driver
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 09:17:50AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + /* Read the primary device as the whole */
>
> I can't figure out what this comment means
It's part of...
> > + dev_err(tas_dev->dev, "%s, regmap doesn't exist.\n",
> > + __func__);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + /* Read the primary device */
>
> What is a primary device?
...a thing where they're trying to present multiple devices as a unified
device with grouped control, it looks like there's some hardware support
for this.
> > + /* Failed got calibration data from EFI. */
> I don't get what the dependency on EFI is. First time I see a codec
> needing this.
> Please describe in details what you are trying to accomplish.
It seems fairly normal to store calibration details in the device
firmware?
> > + if (crc == tmp_val[21]) {
> > + time64_to_tm(tmp_val[20], 0, tm);
> > + dev_dbg(tas_priv->dev, "%4ld-%2d-%2d, %2d:%2d:%2d\n",
> > + tm->tm_year, tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_mday,
> > + tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec);
> What is this about? Why would a codec care about time?
I can see someone finding it helpful to confirm when the calibration data
that got applied was generated to make sure they're testing/using what
they thought they were.
> In addition, it's rather surprising that on attachment there is not a
> single regmap access?
Don't know if there's something different with Soundwire but for I2C/SPI
devices it's a reasonable pattern to only actually start initialising
the registers when the device actually becomes active. Not checked that
this is actually happening.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists