[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKVKPpbMNV9XNc+yJCuaWRupsB5EBjghv++jGqYTnv6QQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 12:59:24 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Yizhou Tang <tangyeechou@...il.com>, kernel-patches-bot@...com,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop bug
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 7:10 PM Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 18/8/23 06:31, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 09:41:46PM +0800, Leon Hwang wrote:
> >> @@ -1147,6 +1152,7 @@ struct bpf_attach_target_info {
> >> struct module *tgt_mod;
> >> const char *tgt_name;
> >> const struct btf_type *tgt_type;
> >> + bool tail_call_ctx;
> >
> > Instead of extra flag here can you check tgt_prog->aux->tail_call_reachable in check_attach_btf_id()
> > and set tr->flags there?
>
> Should we check tgt_prog->aux->func[subprog]->is_func? Or, tgt_prog->aux->tail_call_reachable
> is enough?
Please let the thread continue to a logical conclusion before resending
new version. Will reply there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists