linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v11 28/29] KVM: selftests: Add basic selftest for guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZN/4RjDsBLf0FB98@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:01:26 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
        chenhuacai@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, anup@...infault.org,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, willy@...radead.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
        serge@...lyn.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com,
        tabba@...gle.com, jarkko@...nel.org, yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com,
        vannapurve@...gle.com, mail@...iej.szmigiero.name, vbabka@...e.cz,
        david@...hat.com, qperret@...gle.com, michael.roth@....com,
        wei.w.wang@...el.com, liam.merwick@...cle.com,
        isaku.yamahata@...il.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v11 28/29] KVM: selftests: Add basic selftest for guest_memfd()

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
> 
> > Add a selftest to verify the basic functionality of guest_memfd():
> >
> > <snip>
> 
> Here's one more test:

First off, thank you!  I greatly appreciate all the selftests work you (and
others!) have been doing.

For v2, can you please post a standalone patch?  My workflow barfs on unrelated,
inlined patches.  I'm guessing I can get b4 to play nice, but it's easier to just
yell at people :-)

> >From 72dc6836f01bdd613d64d4c6a4f2af8f2b777ba2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 18:02:50 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Add tests - invalid inputs for
>  KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD
> 
> Test that invalid inputs for KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD, such as
> non-page-aligned page size and invalid flags, are rejected by the
> KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD with EINVAL
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h       | 11 +++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> index eb93c608a7e0..ad20f11b2d2c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,21 @@ static void test_fallocate(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
>  	TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "fallocate to restore punched hole should succeed");
>  }
>  
> +static void test_create_guest_memfd_invalid(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t page_size)
> +{
> +	int fd;
> +
> +	/* Non-page-aligned page_size */

Instead of adding a comment, use the message from TEST_ASSERT() to communicate
that information to the reader *and* to anyone that encounters failures.

> +	fd = __vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, 1, 0);

ioctls() are fast.  Rather than hardcode one value, iterate over a range of
values, e.g.

	for (size = 0; size < page_size; size++) {
		r = __vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, size, 0);
		TEST_ASSERT(r && errno == EINVAL,
			    "Informative error message...);
	}
		
> +	ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
> +
> +	/* Invalid flags */
> +	fd = __vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, page_size, 99);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(fd, -1);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);

And then same thing here.  Then you can use the legal flags to determine what is
and isn't valid, instead of using a completely arbitrary magic number.