lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2dcu7jjwd2bhjbzxrxbfif566nupznb5n4oadnqha4h45w2n2g@4uy2pxkj5bvj>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:14:35 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To:     Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] clk: qcom: common: add _qcom_cc_really_probe

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 04:52:04PM +0800, Luo Jie wrote:
> Add the common function _qcom_cc_really_probe, which takes
> struct device as parameter.

This commit message completely fails to describe the problem/issue the
change is solving. So when we look back in the git history, there will
be no indication of why things looks like they do.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  drivers/clk/qcom/common.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> index 75f09e6e057e..4cbdbfb65606 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> @@ -234,11 +234,10 @@ static struct clk_hw *qcom_cc_clk_hw_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
>  	return cc->rclks[idx] ? &cc->rclks[idx]->hw : NULL;
>  }
>  
> -int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +int _qcom_cc_really_probe(struct device *dev,
>  			 const struct qcom_cc_desc *desc, struct regmap *regmap)
>  {
>  	int i, ret;
> -	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct qcom_reset_controller *reset;
>  	struct qcom_cc *cc;
>  	struct gdsc_desc *scd;
> @@ -305,6 +304,13 @@ int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(_qcom_cc_really_probe);
> +
> +int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +			 const struct qcom_cc_desc *desc, struct regmap *regmap)

Why do we want to keep this wrapper around?


PS. Please give some time before posting v5, I would like to understand
the MDIO regmap operations in patch 4 better before commenting on it.

Regards,
Bjorn

> +{
> +	return _qcom_cc_really_probe(&pdev->dev, desc, regmap);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_cc_really_probe);
>  
>  int qcom_cc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, const struct qcom_cc_desc *desc)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h
> index 9c8f7b798d9f..9710ade9bf15 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ extern int qcom_cc_register_sleep_clk(struct device *dev);
>  
>  extern struct regmap *qcom_cc_map(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  				  const struct qcom_cc_desc *desc);
> +extern int _qcom_cc_really_probe(struct device *dev,
> +			 const struct qcom_cc_desc *desc, struct regmap *regmap);
>  extern int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  				const struct qcom_cc_desc *desc,
>  				struct regmap *regmap);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ