lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d92e7938-49e0-3b4c-89ab-77dcd15b8676@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:04:31 +0200
From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill do_each_thread()

On 17. 08. 23, 18:37, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Eric has pointed out that we still have 3 users of do_each_thread().
> Change them to use for_each_process_thread() and kill this helper.

Is there any change in behavior? Why is for_each_process_thread() better 
than do_each_thread()?

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ