linux-kernel - Re: Infiniate systemd loop when power off the machine with multiple MD RAIDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:21:25 +0200
From:   Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To:     Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        AceLan Kao <acelan@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Linux RAID <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Infiniate systemd loop when power off the machine with multiple
 MD RAIDs

On 8/18/23 10:16, Mariusz Tkaczyk wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:37:26 +0700
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
>>
>>> It needs to build at least 2 different RAIDs(eg. RAID0 and RAID10, RAID5
>>> and RAID10) and then you will see below error repeatly(need to use serial
>>> console to see it)
>>>
>>> [ 205.360738] systemd-shutdown[1]: Stopping MD devices.
>>> [ 205.366384] systemd-shutdown[1]: sd-device-enumerator: Scan all dirs
>>> [ 205.373327] systemd-shutdown[1]: sd-device-enumerator: Scanning /sys/bus
>>> [ 205.380427] systemd-shutdown[1]: sd-device-enumerator: Scanning /sys/class
>>> [ 205.388257] systemd-shutdown[1]: Stopping MD /dev/md127 (9:127).
>>> [ 205.394880] systemd-shutdown[1]: Failed to sync MD block device
>>> /dev/md127, ignoring: Input/output error [ 205.404975] md: md127 stopped.
>>> [ 205.470491] systemd-shutdown[1]: Stopping MD /dev/md126 (9:126).
>>> [ 205.770179] md: md126: resync interrupted.
>>> [ 205.776258] md126: detected capacity change from 1900396544 to 0
>>> [ 205.783349] md: md126 stopped.
>>> [ 205.862258] systemd-shutdown[1]: Stopping MD /dev/md125 (9:125).
>>> [ 205.862435] md: md126 stopped.
>>> [ 205.868376] systemd-shutdown[1]: Failed to sync MD block device
>>> /dev/md125, ignoring: Input/output error [ 205.872845] block device
>>> autoloading is deprecated and will be removed. [ 205.880955] md: md125
>>> stopped. [ 205.934349] systemd-shutdown[1]: Stopping MD /dev/md124p2
>>> (259:7). [ 205.947707] systemd-shutdown[1]: Could not stop MD /dev/md124p2:
>>> Device or resource busy [ 205.957004] systemd-shutdown[1]: Stopping MD
>>> /dev/md124p1 (259:6). [ 205.964177] systemd-shutdown[1]: Could not stop MD
>>> /dev/md124p1: Device or resource busy [ 205.973155] systemd-shutdown[1]:
>>> Stopping MD /dev/md124 (9:124). [ 205.979789] systemd-shutdown[1]: Could
>>> not stop MD /dev/md124: Device or resource busy [ 205.988475]
>>> systemd-shutdown[1]: Not all MD devices stopped, 4 left.
>>
>> See Bugzilla for the full thread and attached full journalctl log.
>>
>> Anyway, I'm adding this regression to be tracked by regzbot:
>>
>> #regzbot introduced: 12a6caf273240a
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217798 #regzbot title: systemd
>> shutdown hang on machine with different RAID levels
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217798
>>
> 
> Hello,
> The issue is reproducible with IMSM metadata too, around 20% of reboot hangs. I
> will try to raise the priority in the bug because it is valid high- the
> base functionality of the system is affected.
> 
> Christoph, could you take a look in short term?
> 
Does this help?


diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 78be7811a89f..b3661c8def8c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -9575,6 +9575,7 @@ static int md_notify_reboot(struct notifier_block 
*this,
         struct mddev *mddev, *n;
         int need_delay = 0;

+       flush_workqueue(md_misc_wq);
         spin_lock(&all_mddevs_lock);
         list_for_each_entry_safe(mddev, n, &all_mddevs, all_mddevs) {
                 if (!mddev_get(mddev))

Cheers,

Hannes