[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230818095000.937633-1-liaochang1@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 09:50:00 +0000
From: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: stats: Improve the performance of cpufreq_stats_create_table()
In the worst case, the freq_table of policy data is not sorted and
contains duplicate frequencies, this means that it needs to iterate
through the entire freq_table of policy to ensure each frequency is
unique in the freq_table of stats data, this has a time complexity of
O(N^2), where N is the number of frequencies in the freq_table of
policy.
However, if the policy.freq_table is already sorted and contains no
duplicate frequencices, it can reduce the time complexity of creating
stats.freq_table to O(N), the 'freq_table_sorted' field of policy data
can be used to indicate whether the policy.freq_table is sorted.
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
index 55c7ffd37d1c..fcb74050711a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
@@ -243,7 +243,8 @@ void cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
/* Find valid-unique entries */
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, policy->freq_table)
- if (freq_table_get_index(stats, pos->frequency) == -1)
+ if ((policy->freq_table_sorted != CPUFREQ_TABLE_UNSORTED) ||
+ (freq_table_get_index(stats, pos->frequency) == -1))
stats->freq_table[i++] = pos->frequency;
stats->state_num = i;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists