lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2023 13:10:12 +0200
From:   Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>
To:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] arm64: dts: freescale: Add support for LX2162 SoM & Clearfog Board

Add support for the SolidRun LX2162A System on Module (SoM), and the
Clearfog evaluation board.

This patch-set introduces:
- dt node for lx2160a serdes block #2
- dtsi for lx2162a system on module
- dts for lx2162 clearfog

Firstly Please note that checkpatch was complaining about the EEPROMS:
- DT compatible string "st,24c02" appears un-documented
- DT compatible string "st,24c2048" appears un-documented
- DT compatible string "atmel,24c2048" appears un-documented
However to my eyes these *are* already documented in at24.yaml,
and are also used in existing device-tree.

checkpatch is also complaining about various parts of lx2160a.dtsi,
as well as the use of "sfp" property in dpmac nodes - which are common
across layerscape based dts.

Secondly the MAINTAINERS file has not been modified.
Is it required I add myself or *someone* for these new dts?

Changes since v4:
- extended commit hash reference to 12 characters in description

Changes since v3:
- moved status properties to be last
- changed ethernet-phy on som from /delete-node/ to disabled,

Changes since v2:
- fixed property order in som dts such that compatible is first property
- added reviewed-by tags to bindings patches

Changes since v1:
- fixed DT binding changes to not break existing boards
- explained new board / som DT binding in commit message
- added missing DT binding for dpaa2 mac "phys" property
- reordered "compatible" and "reg" properties: first "compatible", then "reg"
- replaced chip-specific DT node names with generic ones

Josua Mayer (4):
  arm64: dts: lx2160a: describe the SerDes block #2
  dt-bindings: net: dpaa2 mac: add phys property
  dt-bindings: arm: Add SolidRun LX2162A SoM & Clearfog Board
  arm64: dts: freescale: Add support for LX2162 SoM & Clearfog Board

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml          |   9 +-
 .../bindings/net/fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac.yaml      |   4 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile        |   1 +
 .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi |   6 +
 .../dts/freescale/fsl-lx2162a-clearfog.dts    | 373 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../dts/freescale/fsl-lx2162a-sr-som.dtsi     |  73 ++++
 6 files changed, 465 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2162a-clearfog.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2162a-sr-som.dtsi

Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
-- 
2.35.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ