[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CH2PR12MB3895048FF2418B8DAE059169D71BA@CH2PR12MB3895.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 12:08:24 +0000
From: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: mlxbf3: Support add_pin_ranges()
> Better now,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>
> ...
>
> > #define MLXBF3_GPIO_MAX_PINS_PER_BLOCK 32
> > +#define MLXBF3_GPIO_MAX_PINS_BLOCK0
> MLXBF3_GPIO_MAX_PINS_PER_BLOCK
> > +#define MLXBF3_GPIO_MAX_PINS_BLOCK1 24
>
> Since it's a fix for backporting, I'm not insisting to amend it now, but can we
> actually drop the common define and use
>
> #define MLXBF3_GPIO_MAX_PINS_BLOCK0 32
> #define MLXBF3_GPIO_MAX_PINS_BLOCK1 24
>
> and modify code accordingly, please?
Sure. Will send a v4 addressing this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists