[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZN9iDSj3/vdk5pRX@krava>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:20:29 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: Rong Tao <rtoax@...mail.com>
Cc: olsajiri@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, haoluo@...gle.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, mykolal@...com, rongtao@...tc.cn,
sdf@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize
kallsyms cache
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 09:39:32AM +0800, Rong Tao wrote:
> Hi, Jiri. Thanks for your reply.
>
> libbpf_ensure_mem() is in libbpf_internal.h, samples/bpf/ can't see it, do we
> reposition the function declaration?
I see, I had no idea trace_helpers.[ch] is included in samples/bpf
but it seems to have libbpf linked statically.. so you could just
include libbpf_internal.h and it should work, right? like we do
in selftests
jirka
>
> Good Day
> Rong Tao
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists